(Update: also see the post following this one)
After my second attempt I went into a post-exam depression. I just couldn’t for the life of me understand what went wrong. I went through everything in my head and apart from that one question that I probably failed but COULD have gotten correct I couldn’t see what went wrong.
I started to consider a reread. I was a bit scared considering the very low chance of actually getting the results changed. I googled after the experience of others and yes, I did find a few who actually passed. I also found a lot of posts that claims that 0.3% of all rereads ends with a changed grade. I couldn’t make up my mind.
I went back to analyzing what I might have done wrong. That was when it hit me. During one of the bootcamps one of the other students lost something like 40 points without understanding why. After some digging and troubleshooting the instructor figured that maybe it was because the student had forgotten to disable debug. They reloaded the configs, made sure debug was disabled and then regraded and WHOOP, there were the points! I searched my memory and there it was. I had forgotten to disable debug on at least 2-3 devices who were involved in two different tickets. Could those be the two tickets I missed? Could it be that debug output messed with the automatic grading scripts? If that broke the training lab in one of the Cisco 360 bootcamps, perhaps the same could happen in the lab itself?
But still the horrible stats held me back. 0.3%! But then, on the 10th day after my second attempt I thought to myself, “to hell with it, it’s only 300 dollars and I’ve (read: work) spent a LOT more than that. I’ll give it a try”. I applied for a re-read on September 29th.
Since then I’ve been logging into the portal and checked at least 5 times every day. Nothing happened until 2 days ago. 2 days ago the “FAIL” mark and the score report link disappeared. They weren’t replaced by anything, just blank fields. I started to freak out and tried to find something online that could tell me what that might mean. The only thing I found was a forum thread where someone had seen the exact same thing. After a while he had gotten his exam changed to a PASS. Someone else posted in that same thread and said that he hadn’t seen anything like that but he also said that he didn’t get his score changed.
So now I’m starting to feel really hopeful (ask my nerdy-cisco-coworkers 😉 ). I only found one single site that described the exact same thing but it sure was enough to get me going. I was hoping that the site would be updated the next day but NOTHING happened! So now the “fear” creeps back in. I’m beginning to think that it doesn’t mean anything. It will end with a confirmation of the fail. It’s been a month (kinda) since the attempt and I haven’t studied anything. I’m preparing for the inevitable decision: I’m giving up. I can’t do it again. At least not now. Maybe if I wait six months…
But then I wake up today to find this in my inbox:
Dear Magnus Pahlsson ,
Regarding the re-read request of your CCIE Lab exam was taken September 19 2011
We are glad to inform you that your re-read request has been completed and uploaded to your CCIE CCO Account.
The CCIE lab exam re-read result status has been changed from FAIL TO PASS. We are processing your re-read exam fee waiver.
They don’t say anything about my new result. I haven’t even gotten a new percentage so I don’t know how much the manual grading changed my score. But to be honest I don’t care.
I’m a single parent with 2 kids. I work full time. I’ve been studying nights. I’ve had pretty close to no social life for the last two years.
Today I am CCIE #30914 and damn, it feels good.
I bummed around for 1.5 week after the first failure. I was upset but not suicidal (those who have ever attempted CCIE knows what I mean). I finally pulled myself together and booked a new seat September 19th. That was the first possible date considering the 30 day waiting time. I felt that since I was so close it would be stupid to wait too long. So back to brussels I go.
The first time I was rather stressed in the beginning. Without going into too much detail due to NDA; let’s just say that the first question I was working on on my first attempt was something that I can normally do in my sleep. But this time it took 15 minutes to fix it. I have no way to explain it other than I was stressed. As I said in the previous post I broke requirements on two different questions. I blame this on stress as well. But the good thing about the attempt #1 was that I knew where I failed and I knew what I had to work on. But hey, that was actually the entire point of the first attempt. See my previous post about not pushing the date forward.
So there I am. Second attempt. I’m very familiar with everything and I can sense that I’m a lot more focused this time. Since I know that I broke requirements the first time I was VERY careful not to do it again. I made sure to read the questions at least 2 times before typing in a single character (yes, two times before starting each individual ticket). Once again I finish the lab knowing that I probably missed one question but this time I’m 100% certain that I got the other 9 correct.
I felt extremely confident moving on to the configuration part. Again, due to NDA I can’t give any details. Let’s just say that I with very good reason felt very confident as soon as I started the lab and saw the topology and questions. I finished in 4 hours and spent an hour verifying. I left an hour early. I felt so good. I was very certain that I’d pass.
So waiting begins again. This time I knew that it would probably take a while so I wasn’t freaking out when I still hadn’t gotten the mail by the time I woke up the next day. At 8:45 (or so) I got the notification. I logged on and see that ugly word.. FAIL. Really, must they type it in upper case? Isn’t it bad enough as it is? Must they throw it in our faces like that? I have never been so close to actually throwing my computer against the wall. The first time I was disappointed but not surprised but this time I just couldn’t understand what went wrong.
Brussels – August 18th
I arrive at the Cisco offices at 7:45am. Just a wee bit early, to say the least. The doors are locked so I have to wait outside. Over the next couple of minutes more people arrive to wait outside and we all just look at each other and ask “CCIE?”. The slightly nervous nod from everyone confirms that we’re all there for the same purpose.
At 8am they open the doors and we get to sign in. “Take a seat over there and the proctor will come get you in 5 minutes”. After a few minutes the woman in the reception answers the door phone-thingy from the other Cisco-building. “No sir, you are the wrong entrance, you need to go to the other building”. A few minutes later the last person to join us sits down to wait and I once again confirm to myself that it was a good idea to scout the place the night before.
Those 5 minutes turns into 30 and at this point I’m beginning to get annoyed. Finally the proctor arrives and we move to the fourth floor and the CCIE-lab. The environment is very pleasant. Everything is clean and there’s endless access to coffee and water. I think there’s a vending machine as well but don’t take this as a promise. I simply don’t remember. I’ve seen a lot of discussions about the quality of keyboards and such and I have to say that the equipment I got to use didn’t feel old at all. Maybe a few months at most. And yes, it’s US english layout.
8:43 – lab starts. The two hours for trouble shooting passed *really* fast. I knew that I failed one questions because quite honestly I did not know what to do. I am certain that I got 7 questions correct. I know that I got the 8th as well but quite soon I realize that I broke requirements. And then there’s the last one that I’m kind of unsure of. Configuration went fine. I finished in 4 hours and had 2 hours for verification. I was pretty sure that I would pass config. A few hours after the exam I realized that I probably broke requirements on that last question so I’m preparing for a fail. But I wasn’t sure so I was still hoping at this point.
So I leave Cisco and go straight to the airport. I had read that the longer you have to wait, the bigger the chance of passing. So this was probably the first time ever that I was happy about not getting e-mails I was waiting for. At 19:20 I switch off my phone for that 2 hour flight home. Still no e-mail so I was starting to feel hopeful. Touchdown at around 21:45. A bootcamp friend of mine passed in April and he got his report at around 11 pm so I was kinda expecting to have an email by now. But nothing.
I drive the two hours home and I’m just continuously refreshing for new mail but nothing! I stay up till 1 am but STILL nothing! So I go to bed. Wake up the next the day and STILL nothing! Then finally at 8:45 I get the notification that my report is ready. I login and see that FAIL that I in my head knew that I would see but my heart hadn’t given up hope. I passed configuration but failed troubleshooting by one question. Just as I was expecting. I was disappointed but not surprised.
10 TS-tickets. I had 9 verified solutions but results show that I missed 3 tickets and depending on which ones you miss you can afford 2-3. I know that I missed one of the bigger ones (quite frankly I did not know how to solve it. I do now). Passed configuration. Just way too close. But good enough first attempt, I guess. Going back for a second attempt..
Three days of TS-labs. I’ve so far completed 6 IPX labs and 3 INE labs. I’m waiting for today’s fourth lab-configs to load. While doing the last lab I found myself getting pissed off at my worthless co-workers who kept doing such stupid mistakes. Took a while before I realized that it’s not real work 😮
Did INE labs till midnight last night. Out of bed at 5:45 this morning to do IPX labs. Maybe I should start a rack rental business with more EU-friendly session times. Though I must say that it’s good to have access to both INE and IPX labs. They have different approaches to scheduling which makes it a little more flexible for me.
Currently loading todays third IPX TS-lab which is why I have time to ramble here. Actually, it’s not a matter of having time. It’s a matter of not falling asleep.
This time 1 year ago I had been CCIE-written for about 3 weeks. I had begun talking with Global Knowledge about arranging the Cisco 360 bootcamps in Sweden because I didn’t want to go abroad. As it happened they were able to to schedule both CIERS1 and 2 in Sweden and exactly the two weeks that I asked for.
Unfortunately I had asked for CIERS1 and 2 to be scheduled close to each other because I was under the impression that you were supposed to take them both close to the exam. As it turns out CIERS1 is meant to be taken early on and CIERS2 closer to the lab. Neither I or the local GK team knew this so in retrospect I have to say that I wish that the instructor (great guy from Egypt) had talked with the local GK team and explained the best course of action. After all, he did say that he was surprised about the scheduling.
CIERS1 took place late August, 2010. It was me and 4 other guys. I was the first person to buy the 360 package in Sweden (at least according to GK) so these guys must have been #2-4 (the fifth was a german). It was fairly obvious from the beginning that only two of us were by far ready even for the first bootcamp. The week passed and we now had 3 weeks to study before CIERS2.
Thursday of the CIERS1 course my boss called me and said that he had been approached by another team within the company. Long story short, I got “upgraded” and I changed groups. It happened so fast. Those three weeks between CIERS1 and 2 just passed and I didn’t have one single study day. But I was still fairly happy with the week. It took place late September and I had originally planned on sitting the lab mid-october. Since I had lost so much study time while changing jobs I had decided to bump it till mid-november and I was fine with that, it felt ok. Buuuuut. New job took all my time. I have no one to blame but myself since my new boss had given an OK for studies. I should and could have studied but I didn’t.
2010 passed and in January (December?) I got the next BIG hit right in my face. That one other guy who I felt had potential to pass had gone for his first attempt. He got torn to pieces. A month or so later he went for his second. And got torn to pieces again. This absolutely wrecked my confidence. If HE didn’t make it, how could I?
Then in April 2011 he finally passed and became CCIE. Since then we’ve been been talking. I’ve been fighting my way through work load and trying to find time for studies. I’ve had at least 3-4 dates set but I keep cancelling. I keep pushing it further and further away.
In exactly three weeks from now I’ll be in my car on the way to the airport. I grabbed my confidence and forced it to schedule. I was shaking so hard when I was entering all the required data. I know that I will probably fail but that’s ok. I can’t keep pushing the date forward. People keep saying how hard it is but I do honestly believe that many people fail simply because they’re not ready. I can’t let “rumors” stop me from even going. I MUST give it a shot so that I can get a true feeling about how it is. Can’t keep hiding from that FAIL e-mail.
I plan on going back in mid-october and PASS…!
…or maybe it turns out that I’ve been scared for all the wrong reasons? Maybe 23 days from now I’ll be sitting on my porch with a glass of champagne? I’ll never know if I don’t try..
Reviewing QoS. And I would like to quote what a friend said after I did a G+ post about FRTS: “this is why you don’t go for a CCIE. Who cares about Frame Relay?”. And you know what, I have to agree with him. I’m looking forward to being done with this (be it a pass or a fsckit) because I’ll be able to keep up with technologies that I actually *need* to master.
And I’m so not ready. Oh well. Labtime, flight, hotel booked. I’ll be an experience richer if nothing else. And besides, by accepting the fact that I might fail on the first attempt I avoid the possibility of hitting post-failure depression like some I know.
A friend is preparing for his CCNP and asked me to give him an OSPF Troubleshooting lab in GNS3. Didn’t take long and it was a lot of fun. I might, however, have made it too difficult for a CCNA. But hey, learning by doing is the best.
And once again I realize that teaching is so much fun. I’ll try this 14 task lab on my guinea pig and then possibly do a larger workshop with more co-workers.
Complete list of tasks:
Task 1 (2p)
R2 and R3 should have an adjacency in Area0.
Task 2 (2p)
Verify that Loopback 0 of R6 appears in the routing table of R1.
Task 3 (3p)
Verify that R3 is the designated router on the link to R7
Task 4 (2p)
R7 is injecting a default route yet no other router shows a default route.
Task 5 (2p)
Verify that R2 and R9 have 2 OSPF adjacencies.
Task 6 (2p)
Verify that R2 and R9 use equal cost load balancing.
Task 7 (2p)
R9 and R2 peers over two links. R9 should only have one network statement.
Task 8 (2p)
R9 should use link speed of 1000Mbit/s as default for calculating link cost.
Task 9 (3p)
R7 is announcing its Loopback 0 interface in Area0 yet it doesn’t show up in R3’s routing table. Remove the configuration at fault and explain why it appeared in all routers but R3.
Task 10 (2p)
R9 redistributes routes learned from RIP. Verify that R2 sees all these.
Task 11 (2p)
Verify that R2 only has 1 route that matches all 192.168.x.x routes.
Task 12 (3p)
Why doesn’t the cost of the redistributed RIP routes increment as they are propagated in OSPF? Add configuration that changes this.
Task 13 (3p)
R5 advertises several Loopback interfaces in the 172.168/16 range. Why does R1 see most of these as /32 instead of the configured netmask of /24? Add configuration that modifies this.
Task 14 (3p)
Summarize the 172.168.x.x networks into 2 different routes.