Three days of TS-labs. I’ve so far completed 6 IPX labs and 3 INE labs. I’m waiting for today’s fourth lab-configs to load. While doing the last lab I found myself getting pissed off at my worthless co-workers who kept doing such stupid mistakes. Took a while before I realized that it’s not real work 😮
Did INE labs till midnight last night. Out of bed at 5:45 this morning to do IPX labs. Maybe I should start a rack rental business with more EU-friendly session times. Though I must say that it’s good to have access to both INE and IPX labs. They have different approaches to scheduling which makes it a little more flexible for me.
Currently loading todays third IPX TS-lab which is why I have time to ramble here. Actually, it’s not a matter of having time. It’s a matter of not falling asleep.
This time 1 year ago I had been CCIE-written for about 3 weeks. I had begun talking with Global Knowledge about arranging the Cisco 360 bootcamps in Sweden because I didn’t want to go abroad. As it happened they were able to to schedule both CIERS1 and 2 in Sweden and exactly the two weeks that I asked for.
Unfortunately I had asked for CIERS1 and 2 to be scheduled close to each other because I was under the impression that you were supposed to take them both close to the exam. As it turns out CIERS1 is meant to be taken early on and CIERS2 closer to the lab. Neither I or the local GK team knew this so in retrospect I have to say that I wish that the instructor (great guy from Egypt) had talked with the local GK team and explained the best course of action. After all, he did say that he was surprised about the scheduling.
CIERS1 took place late August, 2010. It was me and 4 other guys. I was the first person to buy the 360 package in Sweden (at least according to GK) so these guys must have been #2-4 (the fifth was a german). It was fairly obvious from the beginning that only two of us were by far ready even for the first bootcamp. The week passed and we now had 3 weeks to study before CIERS2.
Thursday of the CIERS1 course my boss called me and said that he had been approached by another team within the company. Long story short, I got “upgraded” and I changed groups. It happened so fast. Those three weeks between CIERS1 and 2 just passed and I didn’t have one single study day. But I was still fairly happy with the week. It took place late September and I had originally planned on sitting the lab mid-october. Since I had lost so much study time while changing jobs I had decided to bump it till mid-november and I was fine with that, it felt ok. Buuuuut. New job took all my time. I have no one to blame but myself since my new boss had given an OK for studies. I should and could have studied but I didn’t.
2010 passed and in January (December?) I got the next BIG hit right in my face. That one other guy who I felt had potential to pass had gone for his first attempt. He got torn to pieces. A month or so later he went for his second. And got torn to pieces again. This absolutely wrecked my confidence. If HE didn’t make it, how could I?
Then in April 2011 he finally passed and became CCIE. Since then we’ve been been talking. I’ve been fighting my way through work load and trying to find time for studies. I’ve had at least 3-4 dates set but I keep cancelling. I keep pushing it further and further away.
In exactly three weeks from now I’ll be in my car on the way to the airport. I grabbed my confidence and forced it to schedule. I was shaking so hard when I was entering all the required data. I know that I will probably fail but that’s ok. I can’t keep pushing the date forward. People keep saying how hard it is but I do honestly believe that many people fail simply because they’re not ready. I can’t let “rumors” stop me from even going. I MUST give it a shot so that I can get a true feeling about how it is. Can’t keep hiding from that FAIL e-mail.
I plan on going back in mid-october and PASS…!
…or maybe it turns out that I’ve been scared for all the wrong reasons? Maybe 23 days from now I’ll be sitting on my porch with a glass of champagne? I’ll never know if I don’t try..
Reviewing QoS. And I would like to quote what a friend said after I did a G+ post about FRTS: “this is why you don’t go for a CCIE. Who cares about Frame Relay?”. And you know what, I have to agree with him. I’m looking forward to being done with this (be it a pass or a fsckit) because I’ll be able to keep up with technologies that I actually *need* to master.
And I’m so not ready. Oh well. Labtime, flight, hotel booked. I’ll be an experience richer if nothing else. And besides, by accepting the fact that I might fail on the first attempt I avoid the possibility of hitting post-failure depression like some I know.
A friend is preparing for his CCNP and asked me to give him an OSPF Troubleshooting lab in GNS3. Didn’t take long and it was a lot of fun. I might, however, have made it too difficult for a CCNA. But hey, learning by doing is the best.
And once again I realize that teaching is so much fun. I’ll try this 14 task lab on my guinea pig and then possibly do a larger workshop with more co-workers.
Complete list of tasks:
Task 1 (2p)R2 and R3 should have an adjacency in Area0.
Task 2 (2p)Verify that Loopback 0 of R6 appears in the routing table of R1.
Task 3 (3p)Verify that R3 is the designated router on the link to R7
Task 4 (2p)R7 is injecting a default route yet no other router shows a default route.
Task 5 (2p)Verify that R2 and R9 have 2 OSPF adjacencies.
Task 6 (2p)Verify that R2 and R9 use equal cost load balancing.
Task 7 (2p)R9 and R2 peers over two links. R9 should only have one network statement.
Task 8 (2p)R9 should use link speed of 1000Mbit/s as default for calculating link cost.
Task 9 (3p)R7 is announcing its Loopback 0 interface in Area0 yet it doesn’t show up in R3’s routing table. Remove the configuration at fault and explain why it appeared in all routers but R3.
Task 10 (2p)R9 redistributes routes learned from RIP. Verify that R2 sees all these.
Task 11 (2p)Verify that R2 only has 1 route that matches all 192.168.x.x routes.
Task 12 (3p)Why doesn’t the cost of the redistributed RIP routes increment as they are propagated in OSPF? Add configuration that changes this.
Task 13 (3p)R5 advertises several Loopback interfaces in the 172.168/16 range. Why does R1 see most of these as /32 instead of the configured netmask of /24? Add configuration that modifies this.
Task 14 (3p)Summarize the 172.168.x.x networks into 2 different routes.